Bacterial flagella-aided movement

Classical purviews deem a rotary functionalism to the basal module of bacterial flagella.  This makes the  "creation science" argument of Michael Behe (that such rotary activity is improbable to evolve, but can only be intelligently fashioned) valid.  It was recently pointed out that the rotary movement was just an optical illusion, which had taken the whole scientific community on a wild goose chase of attributing rotary functionality to a simple Type 3 Secretory System. It is unimaginable how the bacterial flagellar assembly could rotate, given that the powering (by chemiosmosis?) and structural attributes don't stand scrutiny to critial query. The murburn model for bacterial flagella deems the basal module capable of expelling relatively warmer water with force and the flagellar filament merely serves as a stabilizing rudder in fluid dynamics. Another major flaw pointed out was that the bacterial flagellar assembly (deemed to be a left hand screw) cannot afford pushing movements to bacteria by a counter-clockwise motion in the real world.